Member Login
eMail:
Password:
Remember Me
Forgot your password?
SCM Site Search

Email this article | Print this article
Affordable Classics from the June, 2007 Issue
Jaguar’s XecrableJS
A bad XJS will rip at your wallet the way an actual Jaguar tears flesh from a gazelle
by Rob Sass

Few automakers have had a more unenviable task than that facing Jaguar when it came time to replace the E-type. Instead of taking an evolutionary approach, as Porsche did when replacing the venerable 356 with the 911, Jaguar opted for a clean slate.

In so doing, they threw the baby out with the bath water and wiped the slate clean not just of the E-type’s difficult ingress and egress and poor ventilation, but of Jaguar’s Le Mans-winning heritage and its reputation for producing great sports cars affordably. Arguably, that decision was responsible for the challenging position Jaguar finds itself in now.

As a result of its particularly long gestation period, when the XJS debuted in the fall of 1975, it looked decidedly dated. Journalists at the time couldn’t get a handle on its looks. Most commented that it looked vaguely Italian, with elements of the Dino 246 in the flying buttresses and Lamborghini 400 GT in the front. Few liked it and nobody...

Please login above or create a FREE account to see the rest of this article.

Get more from SCM when you sign up for a free account.
  • Read all of Affordable Classics, English Patient, and more
  • Free SCM Weekly Insider - the SCM eNewsletter
  • Special offers and exclusive Members Only deals
Get SCM Platinum just $6.95
  • Hundreds of thousands of auction results at your fingertips
  • Over 40,000 individual lots analysed by the experts at SCM
  • Graph market trends and compare up to four different makes/models