Keith’s Blog: To 4C or Not to 4C?

I was recently at the AROC National Convention in Ogden, UT, where I gave a presentation about the evolution of Sports Car Market.

Getting there and back involved a 2,000-mile trip in our 35-year-old 1991 Alfa Romeo Spider S4 automatic. But that’s a story for later.

During my presentation, I explained that after my stroke I had to rethink my collection of seven Alfas. I could no longer operate a clutch, which meant that I could no longer drive some cars I loved. Hence the automatic S4.

Someone asked, “What about a Milano automatic? Or a 4C?”

The Milano was a non-starter. I don’t need a four-door sedan.

But the mention of the 4C got me thinking.

Our 2006 Lotus Elise is my all-time favorite sports car. It’s mid-engine, rear-wheel drive, weighs around 2,000 pounds and has 190 horsepower. There isn’t much between you and what the car is doing.

But it has a 6-speed manual and I can’t operate the clutch.

The Alfa 4C follows much the same formula: mid-engine, rear-wheel drive, light weight and very little in creature comforts. Most important, it has a dual-clutch 6-speed transmission so I could drive it.

A 4C coupe probably wouldn’t work for me, just as I could never easily get into the Elise with its hardtop installed. But a Spider is another matter.

Then there’s the money. Good Elises and 4C Spiders currently live in roughly the same $40k–$50k neighborhood.

So, today’s question: Does it make sense to sell my favorite sports car — one I can no longer drive — and replace it with this Alfa in pursuit of much of the same experience?

What do you think? I look forward to reading your opinions below.

Read my previous blog posts here.

Subscribe to Sports Car Market and get 12 issues, plus six Insider’s Guides, including access to our complete archive. Join here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.